Integrasi Generative AI dalam Pendidikan Arsitektur: Model Tata Kelola Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek untuk Literasi AI, Integritas Akademik, dan Kreativitas Desain
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66052/vktzfy08Keywords:
Generative AI, Pendidikan Arsitektur; Literasi AI, Integritas Akademik, Project-Based Learning, Asesmen Autentik, Tata Kelola Pendidikan Tinggi.Abstract
Perkembangan generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) telah mengubah cara mahasiswa arsitektur memperoleh informasi, mengembangkan gagasan, menghasilkan visual, dan menyusun karya akademik. Transformasi ini memberikan peluang bagi inovasi pembelajaran, tetapi sekaligus menghadirkan tantangan terkait integritas akademik, ketergantungan teknologi, validitas asesmen, privasi data, dan peran manusia dalam pengambilan keputusan desain. Artikel konseptual ini bertujuan merumuskan model tata kelola pembelajaran berbasis proyek yang mengintegrasikan literasi AI, integritas akademik, dan kreativitas desain dalam pendidikan arsitektur. Kajian dilakukan melalui sintesis literatur mutakhir, kebijakan pendidikan, dan penelitian mengenai pemanfaatan GenAI dalam pendidikan tinggi dan arsitektur. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa pelarangan maupun kebebasan penuh dalam penggunaan GenAI belum mampu menjawab kompleksitas tersebut. Model yang diusulkan menempatkan GenAI sebagai pendukung eksplorasi dan umpan balik dengan tetap menempatkan manusia sebagai pengendali utama. Model terdiri atas lima tahap, yaitu penetapan batas penggunaan AI, eksplorasi berbantuan AI, verifikasi pengetahuan, pengembangan desain berbasis keputusan manusia, serta asesmen autentik dan refleksi. Implementasinya diperkuat melalui dokumentasi proses, verifikasi bukti, AI disclosure, penilaian kontribusi individu, dan refleksi kritis.
Downloads
References
Anatasya, V., Putra, N., & Triliyansi. (2025). Utilizing AI (Artificial Intelligence) platforms as learning media for MIPA students at Palangka Raya University. Journal of Chemistry Education Research, 9(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.26740/jcer.v9n1.p1-4
Assegaf, S., Qonitatillah, M., Prameswari, N. N., Kurniawan, B., & Ratnawati, N. (2024). The impact of use of ChatGPT on changes in students’ learning behavior. International Journal of Geography, Social, and Multicultural Education, 2(1), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.26740/ijgsme.v2n1.p49-58
Darmayasa, M. W., Kusuma, I. P. I., & Indrayani, L. (2025). Exploring EFL preservice teachers’ academic integrity of using ChatGPT in educational institutions. Journal of Psychology and Instruction, 9(2), 165-176. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpai.v9i2.101403.
Firmansyah, R., & Nurhasan, A. (2026). Misuse of ChatGPT in learning activities: Challenges and solutions for enhancing student’s academic ethics. Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Teknik Informatika, 14(3), 541-551. https://doi.org/10.23887/janapati.v14i3.86538.
Hariati, H., Kadarohman, A., & Anwar, S. (2025). The intersection of AI and science education in Indonesia: A path forward. Journal of Science Education Research, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/jser.v9i1.74872.
Mansur, A., Amaliya, W., Lestari, W. A., & Adiba, F. (2025). Opportunities and threats of the ChatGPT revolution in completing students’ final assignments. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v9i1.83227.
Najib, K. H., Nofrida, E. R., Budiarto, S., Taryatman, & Ardhian, T. (2026). ChatGPT in higher education: Does acceptance lead to self-directed learning? Jurnal Prima Edukasi, 14(1), 36-48.
Nurdiyanto, H., Hernandes, L., & Kindiasari, A. (2025). Impacts of artificial intelligence integration on teaching practices and student engagement in digitally transformed educational settings. Jurnal Penidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v31i1.96073.
Pratiwi, N. K., Yulianto, B., Mintowati, & Sodiq, S. (2024). Optimizing ChatGPT for scientific writing in the digital age. LITERA, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v23i2.72979.
Rosyanafi, R. J., Lestari, G. D., Susilo, H., Nusantara, W., & Nuraini, F. (2023). The dark side of innovation: Understanding research misconduct with Chat GPT in nonformal education studies at Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dasar, 9(3), 220-228. https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpd.v9n3.p220-228.
Sitinjak, C., Ober, J., & Sakiewicz, P. (2025). Unlocking the potential: Transformative applications of generative AI in East Kalimantan’s educational landscape. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 44(3). https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v44i3.70169.
Suryawidjaja, V., & Gozali, E. P. (2025). Undergraduate student’s acceptance of ChatGPT as a basis formulating AI policies in higher education. Journal of Psychology and Instruction, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.23887/jpai.v9i2.99043.
Taufikin, T., Judijanto, L., & Nurhayati, S. (2025). Enchancing undergraduate research writing using ChatGPT: Effectiveness, student perceptions, and ethical implications. Jurnal Edutech Undiksha, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/jeu.v13i1.94305.
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for gengerative AI in education and research. UNESCO.
Alamasi, R.,, Asfour, O. S., & Ashmeel, R. (2026). The impact of generative AI on architectural design education: Insights from hands-on experience with architecture students. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 17(1), 103879. 10.1016/j.asej.2025.103879.
Jang, S., Roh, H., & Lee, G. (2025). Generative AI in architectural design: Application, data, and evaluation methods. Automation in Construction, 106174. 10.1016/j.autcon.2025.106174.
Tan, M. J. T., & Maravilla, N. M. A. T. (2024). Shaping integrity: Why generative artificial intelligence does not have to undermine education. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1471224. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1471224.
Huang, D., Hash, N., Cummings, J. J.,. & Prena, K. (2025). Academic cheating with generative AI: Exploring a moral extension of the theory of planned behavior. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100424. 10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100424.
Nie, J., Zhang, Z., Lu, X., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, M. (2026). Development and validation of the generative AI assessment literacy scale for higher education students: Psychometric evidence and associations with feedback engagement and academic integrity. Frontiers in Education, 11, 1934632. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1934632.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Zumrotul Avifa K (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
